CRA Readiness Snapshot
What you would have to assess for ENISA reporting tomorrow
No dependency in this snapshot currently appears in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Today, nothing would trigger the 24-hour early-warning obligation of CRA Art. 14. That can change any day a new KEV entry lands, which is exactly what continuous monitoring is for.
⚠ No lockfile — SBOM is not reproducible
This scan is based on a manifest (composer.json), not a lockfile. 5 of 5 dependencies are version ranges, so the exact shipped versions — and their transitive dependencies — cannot be verified. Under the CRA's full obligations (11 December 2027) you must produce a machine-readable SBOM of what you actually ship. Committing a lockfile is the single highest-impact fix in this report.
All findings (15)
| Package | Version | Advisory | Severity | EPSS | Fixed in | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2016-5385 | HIGH | 50.4% | 6.2.1 | HTTP Proxy header vulnerability |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2022-31090 | HIGH | 1.9% | 6.5.8 | CURLOPT_HTTPAUTH option not cleared on change of origin |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2022-31042 | HIGH | 1.9% | 6.5.7 | Failure to strip the Cookie header on change in host or HTTP downgrade |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2022-31042 | HIGH | 1.9% | 6.5.7 | Fix failure to strip Authorization header on HTTP downgrade |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2022-31091 | HIGH | 1.5% | 6.5.8 | Change in port should be considered a change in origin |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2022-29248 | HIGH | 1.3% | 6.5.6 | Cross-domain cookie leakage in Guzzle |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-67353 | MODERATE | 0.4% | 7.15.1 | Guzzle: Unbounded response cookies risk denial of service |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-67339 | MODERATE | 0.4% | 7.14.2 | Guzzle: Proxy-Authorization headers can be sent to origin servers |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-67354 | MODERATE | 0.4% | 7.15.1 | Guzzle: URI fragments disclosed in redirect Referer headers |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-69246 | HIGH | 0.4% | 7.15.2 | Guzzle: Noncanonical host can bypass host-based checks |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-67355 | MODERATE | 0.4% | 7.15.1 | Guzzle: Host-only cookie scope is not preserved |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-55767 | MODERATE | 0.2% | 7.12.1 | guzzlehttp/guzzle: Dot-Only Cookie Domains Match All Hosts |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-69245 | MODERATE | 0.2% | 7.15.2 | Guzzle: Noncanonical cookie domain keeps subdomain scope |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-59883 | MODERATE | 0.2% | 7.12.3 | Guzzle: Cookie Disclosure and Injection via IP-Address Domains |
| guzzlehttp/guzzle dev | ^7.10 | CVE-2026-55568 | MODERATE | 0.1% | 7.12.1 | guzzlehttp/guzzle: Silent HTTPS-Proxy Downgrade to Cleartext |
SBOM summary
5 direct dependencies scanned (0 pinned to exact versions) from composer.json. Vulnerability data: OSV.dev · exploitation status: CISA KEV · exploit probability: FIRST EPSS. Findings on unpinned dependencies cover the full constraint range and may not apply to the exact version deployed.
Using ENISA's CRA Maturity Assessment Model for SMEs? This snapshot provides evidence for the Vulnerability Management domain and the product-level technical documentation question (1.3) under Governance & Documentation.
This snapshot is an automated readiness assessment, not legal advice and not a conformity assessment under the CRA.